SF
SIMMONS FIRST NATIONAL CORP (SFNC)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 printed $209.6M total revenue and $0.26 diluted EPS; NIM expanded 8 bps sequentially to 2.95% (fourth consecutive quarter), while cost of deposits fell 16 bps to 2.44% .
- EPS missed the Wall Street consensus ($0.26 vs $0.36*) on elevated provision ($26.8M) and a $4.3M noninterest expense charge tied to a customer deposit fraud; revenue was roughly in line with consensus ($209.6M vs $209.1M*) .
- Two specific credits migrated to nonaccrual ($49.8M combined) with specific reserves increased to ~60% each, driving $15.6M of incremental provision; management reiterated portfolio soundness and reserves at the high end of their range .
- 2025 outlook maintained: 3%+ positive operating leverage with mid‑teens PPNR growth; management now expects NIM could cross 3% sooner than originally anticipated given deposit remix tailwinds and asset repricing .
- Core deposit franchise momentum (customer deposits +$183M; consumer checking accounts +1.5% YoY) and brokered/time deposit reductions support margin trajectory and funding optimization .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Net interest margin rose to 2.95% (up 8 bps QoQ; up 29 bps YoY), marking a fourth consecutive quarter of NIM expansion, aided by lower funding costs and reduced wholesale funding use .
- Noninterest income increased 6% QoQ to $46.2M on strong swap fee income and SBIC fair value adjustments; wealth management and service charges also improved YoY .
- Deposit remix progress: cost of deposits fell to 2.44% (‑16 bps QoQ) with customer deposits +$183M and improved checking account growth (+1.5% YoY); CFO highlighted CD renewals shifting into lower‑cost pricing and DDA .
- “Our net interest margin could cross 3% sooner than originally anticipated, given positive trends in customer deposits and favorable asset repricing” — President Jay Brogdon .
What Went Wrong
- Elevated provision ($26.8M) on two specific relationships (St. Louis hotel $26.9M; fast‑food operator $22.9M) migrated to nonperforming; specific reserves increased to ~63% and ~61% respectively, contributing $15.6M of incremental provision .
- Noninterest expense rose to $144.6M, including a $4.3M charge tied to a customer deposit fraud; adjusted noninterest expense would have been $139.3M excluding the fraud .
- Nonperforming loans increased to $152.3M (0.89% of loans) and nonperforming assets to 0.61% of total assets; coverage ratio stepped down to 165% from 212% QoQ .
Financial Results
Income and Per‑Share Metrics
Margins & Efficiency
Asset Quality KPIs
Deposits & Funding Mix
Noninterest Income Components
Actual vs Consensus (S&P Global)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic focus: “Our focus is on soundness, profitability and growth and in that order. This first quarter reflected our continued commitment to soundness… we tackled potential challenged credits early and aggressively.” — President Jay Brogdon .
- Margin outlook: “Our net interest margin could cross 3% sooner than originally anticipated, given positive trends in customer deposits and favorable asset repricing.” — Jay Brogdon .
- Credit actions: “We increased our specific reserves to approximately 60% for each relationship… resulting in additional provision expense of $15.6 million in the quarter.” — Jay Brogdon .
- Deposit franchise momentum: “Customer deposits grew $183 million… growth in the number of consumer checking accounts… up 1.5% year‑over‑year.” — Jay Brogdon .
- Tone and positioning: “We’re well positioned to wait for greater clarity.” — Chairman & CEO George Makris .
Q&A Highlights
- Resolution timing for two NPL credits: Management aims to resolve both in 2025, balancing seasonality (St. Louis hotel) and fraud‑related analysis; specific reserves are designed to cover potential loss risk .
- Loan pipeline breadth and drivers: 43% QoQ increase in commercial pipeline, broad‑based across C&I/CRE/agricultural; some demand pull‑forward as borrowers locked attractive economics .
- Deposit strategy and competition: Competitive environment remains intense; deposit optimization continues (CD renewals at lower rates, transitions to DDA); NIB was roughly flat and best in a long time .
- Reserve methodology and scenarios: Moody’s April baseline worsened; SFNC reserved at the high end of its range, implying resilience to baseline deterioration .
- Buybacks and capital priorities: Capital prioritized for organic growth and optionality (including securities); buyback remains a tool for dislocations but not a near‑term priority .
Estimates Context
- EPS: Q1 2025 diluted EPS of $0.26 missed consensus $0.358* by ~$0.10; Q4 2024 beat ($0.39 vs $0.352*); Q1 2024 was roughly in line ($0.32 vs $0.326*) .
- Revenue: Q1 2025 total revenue of $209.6M was roughly in line with consensus $209.1M*; Q4 2024 $208.5M vs $208.7M*, Q1 2024 $195.1M vs $202.3M* .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Core margin trajectory is favorable: NIM rose to 2.95% and could exceed 3% earlier than planned, supported by lower deposit costs, deposit remix, and asset repricing; this is a key upside driver for NII and PPNR in 2025 .
- Credit actions were decisive and idiosyncratic: Two credits drove NPLs and provision higher, but specific reserves (~60%) were set conservatively; portfolio metrics excluding these credits are healthier (NPLs would have declined 5 bps QoQ) .
- Expense discipline intact: Despite the $4.3M fraud charge, management reaffirmed the expense guide, with self‑funded headcount shifts toward revenue production and ongoing procurement savings — underpinning targeted positive operating leverage .
- Funding optimization progressing: Brokered deposits down, time deposits lower, and customer deposits higher; continued deposit remix should sustain margin expansion alongside tactical use of FHLB/brokered funding .
- Capital remains strong with optionality: CET1 at 12.2% and total risk‑based capital at 14.6%; buyback authorization outstanding ($175M) affords flexibility, while dividend increased to $0.2125 (+1% YoY) for Q2 .
- Near‑term trading implication: EPS miss was driven by nonrecurring items and specific credit actions; watch for signs of NIM crossing 3% and normalization of provision levels — catalysts for re‑rating on improving profitability .
- Medium‑term thesis: Management is executing on soundness/profitability/growth with deposit franchise momentum, margin expansion, and expense control; resolving the two credits cleanly and sustaining core deposit growth are key milestones .